Make python snippets able to handle arguments with type annotations. #1
Conversation
* Add bibtex-mode snippets * Move yas-indent-line option to .yas-setup.el file
Thanks to galaunay for the idea to use this to "avoid unnecessary keyspace pollution."
* fix indent function * remove extra line
* bazel mode snippets for cc * bazel mode snippets for java. added bazel mode java snippets and added newline at eof * bazel mode snippets for python * bazel mode snippets for shell
* Add sum snippet for LaTeX * Add int snippet for LaTeX * Add prod snippet for LaTeX * Add binom snippet for LaTeX * Add bigcup snippet for LaTeX * Add bigcap snippet for LaTeX * Remove trailing lines * Replace two-word arguments with one word * Actually, remove the words entirely
* Add various snippets for org-mode * Remove readme and sourcecode and fix typos * Remove reveal_all and edit table snippet
Thanks to @AndreaCrotti for the review and suggestion.
The dollar sign was missing which caused a badly generated setter method.
Fix the case of the getter and setter templates. The previous method "capitalize" turned upper case characters to lower case elsewhere in the string.
* Rename files that are prohibited in Debian packages * Add missing keys for all markdown-mode snippets * markdown-mode: Give a couple snippets more meaningful names * markdown-mode/uft8: Modify description to say UTF-8 * Add MELPA stable badge. @AndreaCrotti is now tagging stable releases, so I believe it is appropriate to close AndreaCrotti#242
|
Concerning af1347d: Oh my, |
|
That's why some tests would be nice :). Sure, commit where it is the more convenient for you. |
This fixes AndreaCrotti#139. For more details, see <https://github.com/ananthakumaran/typescript.el>.
galaunay
force-pushed
the
Improve-arg-for-python
branch
from
e7b3f79 to
46d6424
Compare
|
I assume that this can be closed. |
|
Oh, yes, probably, because your commits are present (rebased/squashed as discussed) on AndreaCrotti#278. @AndreaCrotti is going to move forward with merging the non-conflicting no elisp dependency snippets, and later it looks like we'll have a round three of merging the problematic ones. I'm starting to suspect it might be faster/easier to just rewrite them with equivalent functionality :-p |
As promised.
(Following discussion in elpy #1343)
I made a some tests, the four snippets concerned by the modifications ('_new', '_init', 'class' and 'super') seem to work fine.
I had to an additional quick fix (line 59) for the 'super' snippet to work.