Skip to content

fix incorrect link tag in doc/trpl/nightly-rust.md #24982

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2015

Conversation

poga
Copy link
Contributor

@poga poga commented Apr 30, 2015

Fix incorrect link tag formatting in doc/trpl/nightly-rust.md. Notice the last word of the paragraph.

Before:
before

After:
after

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Apr 30, 2015

📌 Commit 8a20b99 has been approved by steveklabnik

@poga
Copy link
Contributor Author

poga commented Apr 30, 2015

❤️ Thanks for approving!

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 8a20b99 into rust-lang:master May 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants