-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
Updated S3.Event #195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated S3.Event #195
Conversation
…ing field on a s3:ObjectRemoved:* event Added one additional test to check propper json decoding
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
5 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for going ahead! Two small suggestions.
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
@fabianfett Thanks for the feedback! |
@swift-server-bot test this please |
@mufumade Would you mind running |
So this was a bit strange. At first swiftformat changed like 30 files although I only changed 2. On the second attempt swiftformat changed only the comment you provided with your suggestions. I hope it's all fine now. |
@mufumade oh. sorry. it looks to me like our |
For reference: #196 |
@mufumade Would you mind resolving the merge conflicts and running swiftformat again? After that we should be ready to merge. |
@swift-server-bot test this please |
@fabianfett have a look at the newest commit. |
@swift-server-bot test this please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Some internal
acls have been removed. Do we want this? Should we disable redundantextensionacl? @tomerd wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mufumade I'm so sorry for all this swiftformat .
confusion. Would you mind merging the current main
branch and re-adding the dropped internal
acls? I hope this is the last time...
@mufumade 👋 Ping: Are you still interested in getting this merged? I would love to see this land... |
Oh. Sorry for the delay. I'll get started right away. |
@fabianfett So i merged the current main into my branch, ran swiftformat again to check but I am not quite sure what you mean by re-adding the dropped internal acls? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mufumade I have added suggestions to re-add all the internal
ACL that were dropped by swiftformat before. Just add those and we should be ready to go :) Thanks! And sorry for all the confusion.
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabian Fett <fabianfett@apple.com>
@swift-server-bot test this please |
@swift-server-bot test this please |
Motivation:
#194
Modifications:
Changed the S3.Event object size field to an optional due to the missing field on a s3:ObjectRemoved:* event
Added one additional test to check propper json decoding
Result:
s3 event json will now decode successfully even if aws does not populate the
size
field.