Suggest replacing size() == 0 with isEmpty() for collection check #16428
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suggestion: Consider using isEmpty() instead of size() == 0
I hope this doesn’t cause any inconvenience, but I was wondering if there’s a specific reason why size() == 0 is used instead of isEmpty(). Using isEmpty() can make the code more readable and aligns with modern Java practices. It conveys the intent more clearly, improving overall clarity.
I apologize for taking your time and appreciate your consideration.