Skip to content

num: rm wrapping of Float methods as functions #13225

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2014
Merged

num: rm wrapping of Float methods as functions #13225

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2014

Conversation

thestinger
Copy link
Contributor

The Float trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.

It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.

@sfackler
Copy link
Member

Looks like the travis failure is legit.

The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.

It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
This is an implementation detail of the `f32` and `f64` modules and it
should not be public. It renames many functions and leaves out any
provided by LLVM intrinsics, so it is not a sensible binding to the C
standard library's math library and will never be a stable target.

This also removes the abuse of link_name so that this can be switched to
using automatically generated definitions in the future. This also
removes the `scalbn` binding as it is equivalent to `ldexp` when
`FLT_RADIX` is 2, which must always be true for Rust.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2014
The `Float` trait methods will be usable as functions via UFCS, and
we came to a consensus to remove duplicate functions like this a long
time ago.

It does still make sense to keep the duplicate functions when the trait
methods are static, unless the decision to leave out the in-scope trait
name resolution for static methods changes.
@bors bors closed this Apr 1, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 5e12e1b into rust-lang:master Apr 1, 2014
@thestinger thestinger deleted the num branch April 4, 2014 15:52
notriddle pushed a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2022
…ykril

fixup: remove unnecessary `Option`

Fixup for rust-lang#13223, two things:

- `normalize_projection_query()` (and consequently `HirDatabase::normalize_projection()`) never returns `None` (well, it used to when I first wrote it...), so just return `Ty` instead of `Option<Ty>`
- When chalk cannot normalize projection uniquely, `normalize_trait_assoc_type()` used to return `None` before rust-lang#13223, but not anymore because of the first point. I restored the behavior so its callers work as before.
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2024
Use `-D warnings` instead of `deny-warnings` feature.

r? `@flip1995`
changelog: none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants