-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Rustdoc error messages are not consistent #38084
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Comments
cc @jonathandturner @rust-lang/docs |
@GuillaumeGomez rustdoc is maintained by the tools team. cc @rust-lang/tools |
@jonathandturner: And by the @rust-lang/docs as well. ;) Thanks for adding the tools team! @Michael-Zapata: If you have something in mind, just open a PR and I (and others) will help you on it to reach a better outcome. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 13, 2016
…GuillaumeGomez feat(rustdoc): harmonise error messages Based on unix tools wording, it follows a standard format: `program_name: context: error message`, potentially prompting the user to use the `--help` option. This is clearly meant to trigger some discussion on #38084, as messages still use `stdout` and `stderr` somewhat arbitrarily, and there are a few `error!()` calls as well.
Closing as solved. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
While playing around with
rustdoc
, trying to find some things out, most errors are not consistent, especially with the new error formatting. Also, since passes are well-defined, listing them can help, especially in an offline scenario.A small example: (The last one has colours, per the new error format I presume)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: