Skip to content

Enable GitHub Actions on the 3.9 branch #20231

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2020
Merged

Enable GitHub Actions on the 3.9 branch #20231

merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2020

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented May 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

For python/core-workflow#369, no bpo-NNNN available.

Also update to v2 actions where available. --> Moved to own PR: #20232.

@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request May 19, 2020
Closed
vstinner
vstinner reviewed May 19, 2020
View reviewed changes
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

Oh, the "CPython Tests" job of Travis CI failed with network error on installing Debian packages:

W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic/main/binary-i386/Packages Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (91.189.88.152), connection timed out Could not connect to archive.ubuntu.com:80 (91.189.88.142), connection timed out [IP: 91.189.88.142 80]

@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request May 19, 2020
Merged
@vstinner vstinner merged commit c105f7d into python:master May 19, 2020
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

Merged, thanks @hugovk.

@vstinner vstinner added the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label May 19, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @hugovk for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖 I'm not a witch! I'm not a witch!

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @hugovk and @vstinner, I had trouble checking out the 3.9 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c105f7d8955ef9bf51125f6e44e8543e5f0618df 3.9

@vstinner vstinner added needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes and removed needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes labels May 19, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @hugovk for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.9 only security fixes label May 19, 2020
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-20234 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

@hugovk hugovk deleted the gha-3.9 branch May 19, 2020 17:06
@vstinner
Copy link
Member

Modifying the master branch doesn't seem to be enough: #20228 didn't run GHA jobs after I rebased my PR to re-trigger all CI jobs.

I backported the PR to 3.9.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @hugovk for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @hugovk for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, @hugovk and @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.8 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c105f7d8955ef9bf51125f6e44e8543e5f0618df 3.8

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry @hugovk and @vstinner, I had trouble checking out the 3.7 backport branch.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.
cherry_picker c105f7d8955ef9bf51125f6e44e8543e5f0618df 3.7

@vstinner vstinner mentioned this pull request May 19, 2020
Merged
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
@miss-islington @hugovk
Enable GitHub Actions for 3.9 branch (GH-20231)
b008445 
(cherry picked from commit c105f7d)

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
arturoescaip pushed a commit to arturoescaip/cpython that referenced this pull request May 24, 2020
@hugovk @arturoescaip
Enable GitHub Actions for 3.9 branch (pythonGH-20231)
b24beae
@hugovk hugovk mentioned this pull request May 19, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vstinner vstinner vstinner left review comments

Assignees

@vstinner vstinner

Labels
skip issue skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@hugovk @vstinner @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @the-knights-who-say-ni