Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
gh-127119: Faster check for small ints in long_dealloc #127620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-127119: Faster check for small ints in long_dealloc #127620
Changes from 24 commits
cfb70cb
426dd09
4639642
d9c26d3
2f73d47
3b6e1fe
03184a7
5eca812
fedc102
c733d25
829a595
39da0ea
5058e53
8a3d00f
878207a
068a16a
a65ec5a
38fe25f
32b6e44
8543c78
e232ca4
f1ce753
99a2fc7
f6a76b0
9894866
7834406
d91b6e3
ebc7e17
aaf110b
8fcc1d0
aff8812
ebb0bca
8d8e794
4a07ba1
1d5b2e0
cfb9120
b606c09
b4c8444
f76c0e2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe include the benchmarks results (it's a 4% improvement which is still noticable IMO). You should mention that it only concerns PGO builds as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we should excluding the no-gil build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right. According to https://peps.python.org/pep-0683/#stable-abi the no-gil implementation can work with older stable API extensions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Likewise