fix: respect hidden: true for virtual fields that have reference to a relationship field
#12219
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DanRibbens
approved these changes
May 15, 2025
kendelljoseph
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
… a relationship field (#12219) Previously, `hidden: true` on a virtual field that references a relationship field didn't work. Now, this field doesn't get calculated if there's `hidden: true` and no `showHiddenFields` was passed. Co-authored-by: Dan Ribbens <dan.ribbens@gmail.com>
|
🚀 This is included in version v3.39.0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously,
hidden: trueon a virtual field that references a relationship field didn't work. Now, this field doesn't get calculated if there'shidden: trueand noshowHiddenFieldswas passed.