Skip to content

Improvements in littlefs for virtual device #2986

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes commented Jul 24, 2024

Description

  • Improvements in GetAttributes.
  • Add extra test code.
  • Comment test code.
  • Update AZDO pipeline to build on littlefs changes.

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dev Containers (changes related with Dev Containers, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies/declarations (update dependencies or assembly declarations and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of file attributes in the file system driver, enhancing clarity and reducing potential errors.
  • Chores

    • Removed obsolete test code from the file mounting function, streamlining the implementation for better readability and maintainability.
    • Updated job execution logic in the pipeline to include additional file presence checks, potentially altering job execution paths.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes streamline code in two key files related to the LittleFS implementation. The hal_littlefs.c file removes commented-out testing code from the hal_lfs_mount_partition function, resulting in a cleaner structure while preserving core functionality. In littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp, enhancements to the GetAttributes function improve the handling of file attributes by utilizing a local variable, which enhances clarity and control. Overall, these updates promote maintainability and readability.

Changes

File Change Summary
targets/netcore/littlefs/hal_littlefs.c Removed commented-out test code from hal_lfs_mount_partition, streamlining the function.
targets/netcore/littlefs/littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp Enhanced GetAttributes to use a local variable for attribute handling, improving clarity and control.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant FS_Driver as LITTLEFS_FS_Driver
    participant AttributeBuffer as attributeBuffer

    User->>FS_Driver: Request File Attributes
    FS_Driver->>attributeBuffer: Set Initial Attributes
    alt Home Directory
        FS_Driver->>attributeBuffer: Retrieve Home Directory Attributes
    end
    FS_Driver->>User: Return Attributes
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@josesimoes josesimoes added the Platform: Virtual Device & WIN32 Everything related specifically with WIN32 and .NET tool builds label Jul 24, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (3)
targets/netcore/littlefs/littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp (3)

722-723: Improve comment clarity.

The comment "set to empty attributes" is duplicated. Consider removing the redundant comment.

-    // set to empty attributes

756-756: Improve comment clarity.

The comment "if this is home directory" can be improved for clarity.

-        // if this is home directory
+        // if this is the root directory

767-767: Enhance readability by aligning parameters.

Align the parameters of the lfs_getattr function call for better readability.

-        result = lfs_getattr(
-            fsDrive,
-            (const char *)normalizedPath,
-            NANO_LITTLEFS_ATTRIBUTE,
-            &attributeBuffer,
-            NANO_LITTLEFS_ATTRIBUTE_SIZE);
+        result = lfs_getattr(fsDrive, (const char *)normalizedPath, NANO_LITTLEFS_ATTRIBUTE, &attributeBuffer, NANO_LITTLEFS_ATTRIBUTE_SIZE);
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between eeacb90 and b31d308.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/hal_littlefs.c (1 hunks)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/hal_littlefs.c

- Improvements in GetAttributes.
- Add extra test code.
- Comment test code.
- Update AZDO pipeline to build on littlefs changes.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b31d308 and 4caf9d7.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/hal_littlefs.c (1 hunks)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/hal_littlefs.c
  • targets/netcore/littlefs/littlefs_FS_Driver.cpp
Additional comments not posted (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)

243-243: LGTM!

The added condition to check for files containing 'targets/netcore/littlefs' is consistent with the existing conditions and follows the same structure. This ensures that the job will be triggered if any files related to 'littlefs' are modified.

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 55896a3 into nanoframework:main Jul 24, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the fix-littlefs-virtual branch July 25, 2024 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Config-and-Build Platform: Virtual Device & WIN32 Everything related specifically with WIN32 and .NET tool builds Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants