Skip to content

[SYCL] Remove volatile variants of GenericCastToPtrExplicit built-ins #18346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

wenju-he
Copy link
Contributor

@wenju-he wenju-he commented May 7, 2025

The built-ins are implemented with pointer comparison. Volatile is not needed because memory pointed to by the pointer isn't accessed.

The built-ins are implemented with pointer comparison. Volatile is not
needed because memory pointed to by the pointer isn't accessed.
@wenju-he wenju-he requested review from a team as code owners May 7, 2025 00:45
@wenju-he wenju-he requested review from cperkinsintel and jchlanda May 7, 2025 00:45
@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 7, 2025 00:46 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 7, 2025 01:16 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 7, 2025 01:16 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@cperkinsintel cperkinsintel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SYCL side looks good, but double check the sanitizer test failures

@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 9, 2025 04:04 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 9, 2025 04:37 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@wenju-he wenju-he temporarily deployed to WindowsCILock May 9, 2025 04:37 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@wenju-he
Copy link
Contributor Author

wenju-he commented May 9, 2025

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please merge, thanks

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen merged commit 883911a into intel:sycl May 9, 2025
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants