-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28.6k
[SPARK-28040][SPARK-28070][R] Write type object s3 #28379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-28040][SPARK-28070][R] Write type object s3 #28379
Conversation
@HyukjinKwon oh! actually the issue is not transient.
that file doesn't exist anymore because the |
Thanks for pointing it out. I just opened a PR :-) |
Test build #121942 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #121944 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
cc also @felixcheung and @shivaram |
Test build #121948 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #121954 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #121992 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #122110 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #122111 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
@HyukjinKwon 7fccb3a failed linting on Jenkins, but not on GH Actions. The error:
Two things:
For now, I have |
Test build #122112 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #122115 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Test build #122121 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
Alright, completely and totally stuck now. Could go for an extra pair of eyes / advice on how to further debug @HyukjinKwon . Have done extensive regression testing, see https://gist.github.com/MichaelChirico/58327b30aa865fd8bb234b7b98fa6df9 Two types of test (1) test a bunch of common objects to be sure Both are successful, so as near as I can tell, the new and old But still we're failing (it seems a timeout error??) I'm also not able to reproduce the same errors as Jenkins or Appveyor (which have different errors) locally, so it's hard to know how to proceed. I'm also not able to run |
For the Jenkins |
New & old
However, the old code throws a warning in this case, so I doubt that such input was observed previously. |
I didn’t review but I recall something similar this to support glue like 2 or 3 years ago? This serde is very sensitive - we probably need (to add) a lot more tests on this (existing tests are not very comprehensive)
|
Thanks @felixcheung indeed that was me filing that issue about This PR is intended to be a much more general solution to that issue -- a There are already a bunch of tests you could basically drop in from the gist above. My suspicion at the moment is that the usage in |
Test build #126420 has finished for PR 28379 at commit
|
why not just coerce inputs to class
|
We're closing this PR because it hasn't been updated in a while. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. |
Re-filing stale #24888
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Migrate
write*
internals to use an S3 genericWhy are the changes needed?
Robustness -- old version was missing some cases like
glue
that would be treated properly ascharacter
by S3 dispatchDoes this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?