You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2025. It is now read-only.
Before this commit, `fxLayoutAlign` only respected the sibling
`fxLayout` direction (including `reverse` attribute), but not
the `inline` attribute. This commit corrects that behavior
Fixes#1009
Bug Report
I tried to follow the examples in the tests in PR 539 to get inline-flex applied.
What is the expected behavior?
When applying
fxLayout="row inline"
withfxLayoutAlign="fill center"
, the containing element should have inline-flex applied instead of flex.What is the current behavior?
without
fxLayoutAlign
it applies properly, but with fxLayoutAlign for some reason it doesn't.What are the steps to reproduce?
Providing a StackBlitz (or similar) is the best way to get the team to see your issue.
npm
nightly release:What is the use-case or motivation for changing an existing behavior?
mat-button
's wrap whatever you put inside it by span, so trying to usefxLayout
within the body of amat-button
doesn't work right.of course, my example shows that the problem isn't related to material and it shows even without it ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: