Add reference to drake-jenkins-jobs in Jenkinsfile #388
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Once we're happy with the language, I'll make a corresponding PR on drake-jenkins-jobs with a similar comment.
+@BetsyMcPhail for feature review, please.
Reviewable status: all discussions resolved, LGTM missing from assignee betsymcphail, platform LGTM missing (waiting on @BetsyMcPhail)
|
The PR can stay for now, but the need for it very well may change pending resolution of RobotLocomotion/drake#22826. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all discussions resolved, LGTM missing from assignee betsymcphail, platform LGTM missing (waiting on @tyler-yankee)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The wording here seems fine, although I agree we should hold off until the we decide what is happening with drake issue.
Reviewable status:
complete! all discussions resolved, platform LGTM from [betsymcphail] (waiting on @tyler-yankee)
When we created linux-jammy-unprovisioned-external-examples (see #376), the pipeline for that job was copied directly from this repo's Jenkinsfile. They're not identical (the job uses extra parameters), but they should be operating from the same baseline in most cases. This serves as a reminder to always make corresponding changes.
This change is