-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.3k
Vulnerability in "node-forge" transitive dependency of "webpack-dev-server" in "@vue/cli-service": Prototype Pollution #5919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
as shown in the vulnerablity report you pasted, this is s transitive dependency of |
also, looking at the Report, it seems that the effect it features are utility functions that are not used by the features that note for itself provides. So unless we're packed deaths over does make use of these utilities and does so in an unsafe way, which is very unlikely, this is not really a serious vulnerability in our context. |
Thanks for the clarification @LinusBorg ! I have changed the title of the issue reflecting that is a transitive dependency. Related PRs in Related Issues in |
since that will result in a patch release of Existing projects need to explicitly upgrade themselves, i.e. by deleting the lockfile and running the package install again (npm i / yarn) |
That is correct. Should I close this issue or keep it open until |
keep it open fir reference, other people might come here with the same question |
Closing due to webpack/webpack-dev-server#2755 . If you upgrade your transitive dependencies in |
Version
4.5.6
Environment info
Steps to reproduce
Install latest version of
@vue/cli-service
and try to runyarn audit
ornpm audit
and see that the following advisory is shown (in this case yarn):What is expected?
Yarn audit or npm audit should return no vulnerabilities.
What is actually happening?
Yarn audit or npm audit should return one high vulnerability.
Since it is the latest version and the vulnerability is highlighted as high, it would need to be fixed (upgrading node-forge).
Related NPM advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/1561
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: