Skip to content

Document hyperspectral imagery pipeline #6

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
czender opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 8 comments
Closed

Document hyperspectral imagery pipeline #6

czender opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@czender
Copy link
Contributor

czender commented Mar 14, 2016

Add pointers to the hyperspectral scripts and usage examples. Main hyperspectral documentation page is here.

@czender
Copy link
Contributor Author

czender commented Mar 14, 2016

Main hyperspectral documentation page is here (I'm still inexperienced at documenting stuff in GitHub. Bear with me...

@hmb1
Copy link

hmb1 commented Mar 15, 2016

hi i am hmb1 want write access to the doc repo

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

dlebauer commented Mar 15, 2016

granted

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

FYI the documentation can be edited in github but the files are unordered. Easiest to use either the web based ide (which automatically syncs with the github repository) the desktop ide, or command line tools https://github.com/GitbookIO/gitbook

@czender
Copy link
Contributor Author

czender commented Mar 24, 2016

Just placed sample hyperspectral imagery data file and CDL metadata at
http://dust.ess.uci.edu/tmp/test.nc4 and test.cdl, respectively.

@dlebauer
Copy link
Member

@czender I just checked out the test.nc4 file and noticed a few things:

  • all values were either 1 or 0 but units are 'ratio of actual to fully exposed (saturated) channel'. Is this expected (and/or what input file did you use?)
  • variable names are different from CF names specified in reference-data#14. Are these CF compliant?

@czender
Copy link
Contributor Author

czender commented Mar 29, 2016

Thank you for noticing this. Values should not be (all) 0 or 1. There must have been a rounding issue. I will fix it. Right now working on speed. The variable name I picked for now is 'xps_frc' for "exposure fraction". It is yet not a reflectance and has no CF counterpart of which I am aware. When we have a refletance, that will be a CF quantity, and we'll annotate with its standard_name. Am creating a newer netCDF file from a more recent (March 5) raw file. The existing test is old (October) and the format has changed slightly. Will post again when new netcdf is up.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 17, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants