Skip to content

Tracking issue for Rename some of the standard collections for consistency and clarity (RFC 580) #22479

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
aturon opened this issue Feb 18, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Tracking issue for Rename some of the standard collections for consistency and clarity (RFC 580) #22479

aturon opened this issue Feb 18, 2015 · 6 comments
Assignees
@aturon
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Milestone
1.0 beta

Comments

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Feb 18, 2015

rust-lang/rfcs#580
@aturon aturon added A-libs B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. labels Feb 18, 2015
@aturon
Copy link
Member Author

aturon commented Feb 18, 2015

cc @CloudiDust @gankro @alexcrichton

Nominating for 1.0-beta P-backcompat-libs. But it would be great to land this before alpha2...

@aturon aturon mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2015
Merged
@aturon
Copy link
Member Author

aturon commented Feb 18, 2015

I'm planning to implement this, but if someone else is interested, ping me on IRC.

@aturon aturon self-assigned this Feb 18, 2015
@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Feb 18, 2015

For reference:

  • DList -> LinkedList
  • Bitv -> BitVec
  • BitvSet -> BitSet
  • RingBuf -> VecDeque

Types, files, and modules should all be renamed.

@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Feb 18, 2015

(bitv and bitvset are actually in a "bit" file, which shouldn't be renamed)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

1.0 beta, P-backcompat-libs. (May be able to be closed; @alexcrichton is looking)

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added this to the 1.0 beta milestone Feb 26, 2015
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Implemented in #22483 landed in #22491 rolled into #22541

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@aturon aturon

Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0 beta
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@alexcrichton @pnkfelix @aturon @Gankra