8320310: CompiledMethod::has_monitors flag can be incorrect

[satyenme]

Backporting JDK-8320310: CompiledMethod::has_monitors flag can be incorrect. The proposed fix is to rely on Method::has_monitor_bytecodes to set the has_monitors flag when compiling, which is immune to issues where not all byte codes of a method are parsed during compilation. Adds test. Ran GHA Sanity Checks, local Tier 1 and 2 tests. Patch is almost clean (missing src/hotspot/share/runtime/continuationFreezeThaw.cpp).

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8320310 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8320310: CompiledMethod::has_monitors flag can be incorrect (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1732/head:pull/1732
$ git checkout pull/1732

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1732
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/1732/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1732

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1732

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/1732.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ssubramaniam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (32e626d2)