Skip to content

Bloomberg feedback for 5.8 #61226

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 task done
dragomirtitian opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

Bloomberg feedback for 5.8 #61226

dragomirtitian opened this issue Feb 19, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
Discussion Issues which may not have code impact

Comments

@dragomirtitian
Copy link
Contributor

dragomirtitian commented Feb 19, 2025

Acknowledgement

  • I acknowledge that issues using this template may be closed without further explanation at the maintainer's discretion.

Comment

We evaluated the 5.8 beta and RC releases and 5.8 seems to be a low impact release for us.

We are excited to adopt the new flag --erasableSyntaxOnly for the improved Editor experience for features we already avoid. A significant number of our projects already comply with the corresponding rules due to custom error checks that will happily become redundant. We remain interested in gaining the ability to use first-class enums that comply with the TS=JS+types model. For example via the erasable as enum syntax proposal.

# Change Affects Release notes Packages affected
1 Computed properties with a non literal type now appear in declarations Declaration Emit Yes >1%
2 Better type checking of conditional expressions Type Checking No Yes ~1-2%

Computed properties with a non literal type now appear in declarations

Some declaration files changed and now preserve computed properties where index signatures would previously be created. This is an expected change and part of ongoing Isolated Declarations work.

// index.ts
export let foo = "x"
export class Bar {
    [foo]: string
}

// index.d.ts
export declare let foo: string;
export declare class Bar {
    // in 5.8
    [foo]: string;
    // in 5.7
    [x: string]: string;
}

Better checking in conditional expressions

We observed roughly a dozen new compile errors relating to improved conditional return checking.

While not directly announced the change seems related to Checked Returns for Conditional and Indexed Access Types

In TypeScript 5.7 and before, if a branch of a conditional expression returned any we would not get an error if we returned the wrong type on the other branch. Now we do, at least if the expression is in the return of a function:

declare const data: number | string | undefined;
const  result = (): number =>
    typeof data === 'string'
        ? null as any
        : data; // Error now


const  result2: number =  
    typeof data === 'string'
        ? null as any
        : data; // Still not an error ? 😕

Link

@jakebailey
Copy link
Member

For the conditional checking one, the 5.8 RC post documents it: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-5-8-rc/#granular-checks-for-branches-in-return-expressions

(It wasn't in the beta blog.)

@RyanCavanaugh RyanCavanaugh added the Discussion Issues which may not have code impact label Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Issues which may not have code impact
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants