-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Error: NaN is less than min_coverage 95 - Unexpected NaN coverage value #146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Thanks for the issue @Archie-Elvie , sorry for the late reply. Is this still an issue? |
Yeah I still get NaN whenever I try and use it |
@Archie-Elvie by any chance do you have a reference to the exact tool you're using to generate the lcov file and the tool you are using to report the lcov file result? |
It seems like this is an invalid lcov file, at least from the parser standpoint. There is no data on found/hit for functions and lines, which we use for calculating code coverage. Closing as a |
Describe the bug
While running the action it reports NaN coverage, while lcov it self reports 100%.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behaviour:
Use the following lcov.info
lcov.info
Expected behavior
It reports 100% and passes
Screenshots
None
Additional context
None
Let me know if you need more information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: