Skip to content

State of the osrm-frontend repository #380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
fbarbe00 opened this issue Feb 16, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

State of the osrm-frontend repository #380

fbarbe00 opened this issue Feb 16, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@fbarbe00
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
What exactly is the state of the repository? There seem to be a lot of open issues and pull requests.

The docker image hasn't been updated in a while, and does not reflect what can be seen on https://map.project-osrm.org/.

The fork https://github.com/fossgis-routing-server/osrm-frontend (powering https://routing.openstreetmap.de/) seems to have fixed a lot of small issues, why not merge it here?

@frodrigo
Copy link
Member

I think we lake of maintainer with knowledge and interest in frontend technologies. The maintainers are more interested in algorithms and data.

@datendelphin I see you are maintaining fossgis-routing-server/osrm-frontend, aren't you ? Maybe you can merge some equivalent PR here or backport some commits... as you also have the maintainer right on this repo ?

@fbarbe00
Copy link
Contributor Author

I get that! And osrm is an amazing project, because the backend works so well. It'd just be nice if the docker image was updated once to match what is currently visible at https://map.project-osrm.org/.

There are a lot of things that break at the moment, building the docker image with the Dockerfile doesn't work, probably because of the alpine version, since building with alpine:3.7 works fine.

I can try opening a pull request with small fixes, but I don't have experience with this codebase so they'll have to be thoroughly reviewed to see if they make sense.

@fbarbe00
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done: #381 . I'm quite happy with my changes. Please consider merging and updating the docker image on docker hub

@frodrigo
Copy link
Member

frodrigo commented Mar 3, 2025

@fbarbe00 What do you think of merging this small PR before #324 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants